Skip to product information
1 of 3

Svenska Dokumentmallar

Recycling of fishing gear – Application, deadline, proof & Excel | Word/PDF

Recycling of fishing gear – Application, deadline, proof & Excel | Word/PDF

File format
DOCX, PDF, XLSX
Document language
Swedish documents and English User Guide
Number of files
7

Digital download. No physical product is shipped.

Regular price 79 SEK
Regular price Sale price 79 SEK
Sale Sold out
Taxes included.
View full details

About this template

Reopening of a default judgment – Application, deadline check and evidence is a digital template package for a party that has had a default judgment entered against it in a Swedish civil litigation case. The package helps prepare a written request for reopening with the correct district court and keep track of orders, statements of defense, evidence, any enforcement measures, and actual filing.

Important: The files are not an official court form and guarantee neither that the application is timely nor that it will be granted. Reopening a default judgment from a district court should not be confused with reopening a decision from the Swedish Enforcement Authority, appealing an ordinary judgment, or special rules for European small claims proceedings.

What situation is covered?

If a Swedish district court has entered a default judgment against a party and the party is considering having the litigation case reopened. Chapter 44, Section 9 of the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure generally gives the right to request reopening in writing within one month from the day the judgment was entered, with the court where the action was brought. Always check the judgment itself, its reference, and relevant deadline legislation for the actual case.

01. Package contents

15 customer files: 7 editable Word documents (.docx), 7 corresponding searchable PDF files (.pdf), and 1 Excel workbook (.xlsx) with nine tabs. The operational documents and the Swedish guide are in Swedish; a separate English User Guide is included. The PDF files are not promised as interactive official forms.

02. What the files contain

Written application for reopening, supplementary statement of defense where needed, checklist for the judgment's entry date and deadline, evidence and event log, separate notes on enforcement and any issue of stay, and two guides. Excel manually compiles judgments, deadlines, submissions, and checkpoints without making legal assessments.

Document list – file by file

File Content Format
01. Application for reopening Written request to the court that entered the default judgment. DOCX/PDF
02. Supplementary statement of defense Claims, stance, grounds, and evidence for continued proceedings. DOCX/PDF
03. Deadline and judgment check Original judgment, entry date, legal remedy, one-month deadline, and filing receipt. DOCX/PDF
04. Evidence and event log Chronology, document list, and evidence per item of proof. DOCX/PDF
05. Enforcement and stay Check of any enforcement and separate decision/claim basis. DOCX/PDF
06. User Guide SV Step-by-step Swedish workflow, legal check, and limitations. DOCX/PDF
07. User Guide EN English instructions for the Swedish templates; not a certified translation. DOCX/PDF
08. Reopening register Excel with nine tabs for judgments, cases, deadlines, and follow-up. XLSX

Excel register with nine tabs

Dashboard, Cases, Judgments, Deadlines, Evidence, Submissions, Enforcement, Events, and Read Me. Excel can compile controlled manually entered amounts and verified payments into an administrative difference. The workbook does not calculate the legal deadline, the right to seek reopening, the procedural outcome, or a stay. The court's actual decision must be checked and registered manually.

How to use the template package

  1. Read the original of the default judgment, including the court's instructions on reopening.
  2. Check that it is a default judgment in such a Swedish litigation case where Chapter 44, Section 9 is applicable, and that the right to reopening has not already been exhausted.
  3. Identify the judgment's entry date, calculate and verify the last day according to statutory time rules, and check the correct court.
  4. Prepare a written reopening request with the correct district court, case number, parties, and the judgment in question.
  5. Consider whether a supplementary statement of defense or other information should be included – especially in cases of default judgment without an oral hearing or after an order under Chapter 42, Section 11 a.
  6. Send the document on time to the district court in an accepted manner and keep proof of actual arrival.
  7. Monitor continued proceedings and any separate enforcement or issue of stay.

Legal: reopening according to Chapter 44, Sections 9–10

The Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure (1942:740), Chapter 44, Section 9 states that the application shall be made in writing within one month from the day the judgment was entered. If the judgment was entered without an oral hearing, the application should contain what is needed for continued preparation. In 2026, rules were added concerning certain default judgments after orders under Chapter 42, Section 11 a. What should be attached must therefore be investigated against the actual order.

According to Chapter 44, Section 10, the proceedings continue where they stopped when the issue of the default judgment was raised. If a new default judgment is entered against the same party in the case, there is no right to a further reopening. For the last day of the deadline, the Act (1930:173) on the calculation of statutory time may become relevant, but the package intentionally contains no automatic calendar calculation.

Can the judgment be enforced during the reopening process?

Yes, it may be possible. The Swedish Enforcement Act (1981:774), Chapter 3, Section 5 deals with the immediate enforcement of certain default judgments regarding payment obligations, as long as no other decision has been made on account of the application for reopening. An application for reopening does not automatically entail a stay. Separate issues of enforcement must be examined based on the concrete case and any decisions.

Common questions about default judgments

How long do I have to seek reopening?

As a general rule, one month from the day the default judgment was entered according to Chapter 44, Section 9 of the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure. Check the actual judgment, any special rules, and statutory deadline calculation. The fact that a judgment is received later does not automatically entail a new main deadline.

Where should I send the application?

To the court where the action was brought. Use the correct court, correct case number, and follow the judgment's or the district court's current instructions on filing.

Do I need to explain why I did not respond earlier?

The reasons for absence may be relevant background, but an application for reopening should not be confused with a general application for an excuse. Ensure primarily a timely written request and the information for continued proceedings that become relevant according to Chapter 44, Section 9.

Can I request reopening twice?

Not if a new default judgment is entered against the same party in the same case after reopening. The limitation is stated in Chapter 44, Section 10.

Does reopening automatically stop the Swedish Enforcement Authority?

No. If enforcement is relevant, the issue of a special decision on a stay or other measure must be checked. The Excel register and Word letter do not change the enforceability of the judgment.

Does an official court form or a completed legal statement of defense for my case come with it?

No. You get editable templates and guidance. The actual party must fill in correct information, supplement with their own evidence, and consider every court order.

Related document templates

See Business Agreements – Templates for related legal and contract-based documents. The package complements the statement of claim and statement of defense in simplified litigation without replacing these.

Official sources, version, and review

The Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure – Swedish Parliament, The Swedish Enforcement Act, Act on the calculation of statutory time, and Swedish Courts – Litigation in the District Court. Version 1.0, dated October 31, 2026, jurisdiction Sweden. AI-assisted source check performed; no independent external legal review, individual advice, or official approval is claimed.

  • 5 stars: 12 (55%)
  • 4 stars: 6 (27%)
  • 3 stars: 2 (9%)
  • 2 stars: 2 (9%)
  • 1 star: 0 (0%)
J
Julia Svensson
Praktisk og overskuelig

Vi manglede en klar struktur til «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &», og her var der hjælp at hente. Nogle formuleringer skulle tilpasses vores situation. Jeg er tilfreds med resultatet.

E
Ellen Danielsson
Just what we needed

We were dealing with "Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &" and wanted a more consistent way to record the details. The document gave us a more consistent basis for discussion. It helped us decide what to add and what still needed checking. A practical resource that I would use again.

B
Beatrice Lindström
Godkänd mall

Det är inte alltid lätt att veta var man ska börja med Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &. Här fick jag en tydlig struktur. Jag behövde skriva om ett par stycken, men det är också rimligt när situationer skiljer sig åt. Att kunna redigera Word-filen var en tydlig fördel. Användbart underlag, fast jag hade önskat tydligare exempel.

E
Emelie Holmberg
Precis lagom detaljerat

Jag behövde något konkret kring Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis & och föredrog det här framför att skapa ett dokument själv. Några formuleringar behövde finjusteras innan dokumentet passade vårt ärende. Skulle gärna använda en liknande mall igen.

E
Ellen Danielsson
Just what we needed

We were dealing with "Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &" and wanted a more consistent way to record the details. The document gave us a more consistent basis for discussion. It helped us decide what to add and what still needed checking. A practical resource that I would use again.

J
Julia Svensson
Praktisk og overskuelig

Vi manglede en klar struktur til «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &», og her var der hjælp at hente. Nogle formuleringer skulle tilpasses vores situation. Jeg er tilfreds med resultatet.

B
Beatrice Lindström
Godkänd mall

Det är inte alltid lätt att veta var man ska börja med Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &. Här fick jag en tydlig struktur. Jag behövde skriva om ett par stycken, men det är också rimligt när situationer skiljer sig åt. Att kunna redigera Word-filen var en tydlig fördel. Användbart underlag, fast jag hade önskat tydligare exempel.

E
Emelie Holmberg
Precis lagom detaljerat

Jag behövde något konkret kring Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis & och föredrog det här framför att skapa ett dokument själv. Några formuleringar behövde finjusteras innan dokumentet passade vårt ärende. Skulle gärna använda en liknande mall igen.

R
Rebecca Andersson
Oversiktlig og nyttig

For «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &» var det nyttig å få punktene samlet på ett sted. Oppsettet gjorde det lettere å se hva som måtte fylles inn. Alt i alt veldig fornøyd.

J
Josefin Hedström
Bonne base de travail

Pour «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &», je cherchais surtout une structure facile à adapter. Les rubriques sont assez claires et faciles à retrouver. Très satisfait de cet outil pratique.

R
Rebecca Andersson
Oversiktlig og nyttig

For «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &» var det nyttig å få punktene samlet på ett sted. Oppsettet gjorde det lettere å se hva som måtte fylles inn. Alt i alt veldig fornøyd.

J
Josefin Hedström
Bonne base de travail

Pour «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &», je cherchais surtout une structure facile à adapter. Les rubriques sont assez claires et faciles à retrouver. Très satisfait de cet outil pratique.

A
Agnes Håkansson
God mal med noen endringer

Jeg brukte malen for «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &» som et utgangspunkt. Det var greit å finne frem til de aktuelle delene. God hjelp, selv om noe måtte tilpasses.

O
Olivia Söderberg
En bra mall att utgå från

Tydlig disposition för Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &, utan att allt kändes färdiglåst. Några formuleringar behövde finjusteras innan dokumentet passade vårt ärende. Excel-delen gjorde det enklare att arbeta systematiskt vidare. Bra underlag att ha till hands om frågan kommer upp igen.

F
Felicia Holmqvist
Not quite enough detail

I used the template for "Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &" as a starting point rather than writing everything from scratch. It was easy to spot what we still needed to add. It helped us decide what to add and what still needed checking. It was too general for my particular situation.

K
Kristina Johansson
Bruikbaar sjabloon

Ik gebruikte het sjabloon voor ‘Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &’ als vertrekpunt. Ik moest een paar teksten aanpassen aan onze situatie. Een goede basis, met nog wat eigen werk.

T
Tove Kvist
Tydlig och flexibel

Jag använde mallen för Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis & i ett pågående ärende och uppskattade hur överskådlig den var. Inget onödigt krångel i upplägget, vilket jag uppskattar. Excel-delen gjorde det enklare att arbeta systematiskt vidare. Det hjälpte mig särskilt att få ordning på vårt eget material. Lite eget arbete krävdes, men helhetsintrycket är positivt.

O
Olivia Söderberg
En bra mall att utgå från

Tydlig disposition för Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &, utan att allt kändes färdiglåst. Några formuleringar behövde finjusteras innan dokumentet passade vårt ärende. Excel-delen gjorde det enklare att arbeta systematiskt vidare. Bra underlag att ha till hands om frågan kommer upp igen.

F
Felicia Holmqvist
Not quite enough detail

I used the template for "Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &" as a starting point rather than writing everything from scratch. It was easy to spot what we still needed to add. It helped us decide what to add and what still needed checking. It was too general for my particular situation.

A
Agnes Håkansson
God mal med noen endringer

Jeg brukte malen for «Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &» som et utgangspunkt. Det var greit å finne frem til de aktuelle delene. God hjelp, selv om noe måtte tilpasses.

T
Tove Kvist
Tydlig och flexibel

Jag använde mallen för Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis & i ett pågående ärende och uppskattade hur överskådlig den var. Inget onödigt krångel i upplägget, vilket jag uppskattar. Excel-delen gjorde det enklare att arbeta systematiskt vidare. Det hjälpte mig särskilt att få ordning på vårt eget material. Lite eget arbete krävdes, men helhetsintrycket är positivt.

K
Kristina Johansson
Bruikbaar sjabloon

Ik gebruikte het sjabloon voor ‘Återvinning av tredskodom – Ansökan, frist, bevis &’ als vertrekpunt. Ik moest een paar teksten aanpassen aan onze situatie. Een goede basis, met nog wat eigen werk.